![]() ![]() Hangug san-eob geubseongjang museowossna: suchullo meoggosaneun ilbon-ui jachungsu.Han-ilmuyeogjeonjaeng-ui seomag, abe chongliui 5 gaji nolimsu.The Japan-South Korea identity clash: East Asian security and the United States. The danger of deconsolidation: The democratic disconnect. Aarau, Switzerland: Zentrum der Demokratie. Engler, S., Leemann, L., Abou-Chadi, T., Giebler, H., Bousbah, K., Bochsler, D., Bühlmann, M., Hänni, M., Heyne, L., Juon, A., Merkel, W., Müller, L., Ruth, S., & Wessels, B. ![]() London Review of International Law, 6(2), 169–188. Free trade, protectionism, neoliberalism: Tensions and continuities. Obinger (Eds.), Social movements and political activism in contemporary Japan: Re-emerging from invisibility (pp. Towards a new protest cycle in contemporary Japan? The resurgence of social movements and confrontational political activism in historical perspective. Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. Beautiful Japan and its future security policy: An early observation of Prime Minister Abe Shinzō’s plan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Oye (Ed.), Cooperation under anarchy (pp. Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions. Journal of Comparative Politics, 8(2), 4–26. De-Europeanization and de-democratization trends in ECE: From the Potemkin democracy to the elected autocracy in Hungary. Concretely, it shows that post-democracy has determined (1) the historicist framing of emerging conflicts, (2) the government’s legislative struggles to realize historicist policies, and (3) the incontestability of historicist hostility by other ideas in each country. This paper argues that, resulting from decades-long neoliberal politics that have disturbed the state-society balance, the national structure of post-democracy has encouraged each government to push historicism to its limit as an alternative source of political legitimacy in lieu of democratic accountability. The other is Japan’s anti-naturalist historicism, upholding internationalism as a new driving force of history that will transform Japan from a war criminal state into a proper subject in international society while criticizing Korea as being a drag on this transformation. One is Korea’s pro-naturalist historicism, seeing Korean history as being preordained by the universal laws of human progress and defining Japan as a historical reactionary. Most importantly, this paper demonstrates that behind the trade war, there has been a preoccupation of the two governments with mutually irreconcilable version forms of historicism. Nonetheless, these narratives mask several domestic origins. Since Japan’s imposition of export controls against Korea in July 2019 and its following countermoves, including the termination of the General Security of Military Information Agreement, the governments of both countries have presented their own narratives of the origin of this trade war, both of which mirror theories of international politics. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |